The Conference Regarding the Implementation at Local Level of the Government
Strategy for the
Improvement of the Roma Situation in Romania
FINAL REPORT
SUMMARY
Workshop 1:
The partnership between local public authorities and Roma Civil Society
- the civic involvement of Roma people at local level
Workshop 2:
Mechanisms and structures regarding the implementation of the Romanian
Government Strategy for the improvement at local level of the Roma
situation - present and future
Workshop 3:
Positive practices regarding the Roma community development at local
level
Workshop 4:
The Roma minority political representation in local public administration
Workshop 1
The partnership between local public authorities and Roma Civil Society-
the civic involvement of Roma people at local level
Obstacles:
- Lack of acceptance of local authority in establishing a partnership
(Panciu, sanitary mediator)
- Lack of acceptance of Roma people due to the existence of a traditional
cultural domination
- The lack of an adequate legal environment
- The lack of funds needed for the implementation of specific programs
and projects
- The existence of prejudices and stereotypes at local public authority
level
- Poverty limits the access to the public services
- The superficial involvement, in some cases, at Roma leadership level
- Some funds for Roma communities were guided to some other destinations
- The lack of knowledge, at local authorities level, of the Governmental
Strategy Regarding the Improvement of Roma Situation
Recommendations:
· Availability for realizing partnerships (for example the partnership
between The Ministry of Health and Romani Criss Association, which leaded
to the institutionalization of the sanitary and scholar mediator and
brought them on the list of the Job Nomenclature)
· To support and promote Roma women based on competence criteria,
in order to give them access to the public administration jobs
· Unless there are no Roma doctors as sanitary inspectors for
Roma people within the Regional Public Sanitation Offices, they should
be replaced by Roma nurses
· The sanitary mediators salaries should be supported by the
Ministry of Health budget
· To identify solutions for those members of the Roma communities,
who don't have the possibilities of paying the medical insurance fees
in order to provide them medical services
· The collaboration between the public administration and the
Roma minority should be institutionalized. In the places where there
are no NGOs (there are only 100 Roma NGOs, while Roma People live in
over 3000 cities) we recommend that initiative groups should be made
(ad-hoc)
· To use lobbing strategies upon local public administration,
in order to achieve the objectives of the Roma communities
· Establish the priorities
· To identify the financial and human resources needed in order
to set up realistic partnership programs between the local public administration
and Roma communities
· To promote the positive results of the partnership between
local public administration and Roma NGOs
· During the next census the Roma organizations should inform
the members of the Roma communities about the advantages of declaring
their ethnic belonging
· Public administration should establish partnerships with local
Roma leaders
· To realize monographic research focused upon Roma communities,
in order to identify their main problems and needs
· To create independent structures in order to evaluate the finalized
projects impact and to control the funds spending
· Taking into consideration the agreement signed between the
Ministry of Health and ODIHR Bureau (within OSCE), the local authorities
should identify and recommend at least 3 potential sanitary mediators,
which can be trained in this sense during the current year
· To efficiently solve the Roma people's problems, it is advisable
that local leaders to be actively involved in taking control of these
problems and informing local authorities about them
· Concerning the co-financing matters, to eliminate the obstacles
related to the procedure of getting the zero rate certificate as much
as possible and also to reduce the contribution of the Roma NGOs which
are involved in Phare programs from 20% to 5%
· To clarify professional statute of the Roma advisers within
City Halls
Workshop 2
Mechanisms and structures regarding the implementation of the Romanian
Government Strategy for the improvement at local level of the Roma situation
- present and future -
Obstacles:
- The xenophobe and racist speech of some of the local public administration
representatives
- Some City Halls don't reckon the representativity of the Roma communities,
tacking in consideration the 1992 census
- The Roma Experts do not receive all the information related to Roma
problems that reach the City Hall
- The BJRs responsibilities are not clearly set up
- There is not timely and efficient communication neither between
BJRs' members, nor between them and other persons or institutions
which have responsibilities in implementing the Strategy
- There is no financial motivation for BJRs' public employees
- The BJRs' meetings are not held periodically
Recommendations:
· Informing programs made in collaboration with Public Administration
Ministry concerning the Roma people and human rights situation
· To establish partnerships between public institutions and NGOs
for preparing and implementing useful projects
· It is important that all the committees that will take part
to the 2002 census have Roma representatives
· Roma Experts should receive all the data and information related
to Roma situation that reach the City Hall
· Each Roma Expert and other members of the BJRs should clearly
know its responsibilities
· The BJR members, who have been chosen from among the City Hall
employees, should come from European Integration Department and from
Governmental Programs and Strategies Department, both inside the City
Halls
· Supplementary remuneration for BJR's public service employees
from the City Halls
· The BJR's members should be in charge of dealing with the Roma
situation and with the implementation of the Strategy
· The BJR meetings should be set up periodically and any member
should have the possibility to convene them
· To set up periodically reports and an efficient circulation
of the documents
· The Mixed Working Groups for Roma people from local level should
be formed by:
- BJR's members
- Regional ministry services representatives
- Roma organization representatives (if there are any)
- Roma NGO's representatives
Workshop 3
Positive practices regarding the Roma community development at local
level
Obstacles:
- Roma people do not have identity papers
- Some mayors, who are local decision makers, are racist
- There are no health insurance for those who have not paid their
fees
- Their own contribution of those who attend for Phare funds is to
big
Recommendations:
· Small and medium firms should be encouraged in their actions
· The NGOs projects financed from European Union's funds should
be free of VAT
· Local Agencies for Employment and Professional Training should
be involved in professional reorientation of Roma people
· To create training programs for development and management
of the projects in Roma people and public employees matters
· Clear details regarding the partnerships between NGOs and public
institutions should be set up before sending the programs for being
financed
· At least one Roma person should be involved in all the services
of interest for Roma communities
· Identity papers for Roma people
· Some solutions should be found in order to give ownership documents
for the land on which Roma people built their houses / finding a possibility
for giving them in use, based on Law 50/1991
· Roma leaders should be more responsible
· To organize regional meetings in order to gather as many local
public authorities representatives as possible
· To hire Roma persons in Public Guardians Groups
· To avoid discrimination
Workshop 4
The Roma minority political representation in local public administration
Obstacles:
- The real number of Roma people in their communities is unknown
- Roma people don't have juridical identity
- Some Roma people don't realize the real importance of declaring
their own identity
- Some elementary rules for gathering the data for the census were
inefficient or disobeyed by the members of the census committees
- Some experts within the Local Councils don't know Romanes language
- Roma Party Agencies do not have the right to propose projects /
programs
Recommendations:
· Local Level Census should be realized by an expert who belongs
to the Roma community
· Roma people should be informed of the positive implications
of declaring their ethnic belonging
· The members of the Census Committees should be trained in order
to respect the rules of developing a census
· At least one Roma people representative should be a member
of Census Committee
· The Roma people which stand in local elections and succeed
in gaining an important number of votes (even if it doesn't reach the
minimum elections level) should have a representative in Local Council
· In the cities with an important percentage of Roma people,
a Roma representative should have a place in Local Council
· To promote positive practices and to solve the conflict situations
· To create special functions which could apply pressure not
only from outside, but even from inside the organization
· To periodically organize local level meetings in order to debate
the Strategy and to evaluate the level of implementation; it is recommended
that those meetings to be attended by local public authority representatives
as well as by Roma community representatives.